Lewis Tharp and you may Joanna Western, Virginia, 1805

John Dwyer, North carolina, 1756

John Dwyer and you will Jacob Blount sure on their own to invest 50 weight in order to “all of our Sovering Lord King George the following their Heirs and you can Successors” on the 30 Could possibly get 1756, in the a wedding bond. The duty said, “The brand new criteria in the obligation you to whereas a wedding is intended between John Dwyer and you will Jemina Long each of this condition off Tyrrell aforesaid, Virgin lady, Today if there’s zero lawfull bring about so you’re able to hamper the brand new said relationships, then your above duty getting emptiness…” nine

Joshua Farrell, Pennsylvania, 1785

In the 1785, Thomas Harrison, Currier, and you will Joshua Farrell, Mariner, of your City of Philadelphia, joined for the a thread considering the up coming marriage from Joshua Farrell and you may Mary Anne McCartney. 10 Although this number try theoretically on the the end of the brand new Innovative War, it’s still a not bad exemplory instance of new colonial time bonds.

“The condition of the responsibility is such, whenever around shall perhaps not hereafter appear any legitimate let otherwise obstacle, because of the reasoning of any Pre-price, Consanguinity, Attraction, or any other simply Bring about anyway, however, that the over-stated Joshua Farrell and Mary Anne McCartney, may lawfully Wed; which there’s no Match created before every courtroom, to have or regarding these Pre-contract; and have now if for example the told you Parties, and every ones, try of the full Period of 21 years old Many years, and they are not in University fees out of his or her Mothers, or feel the complete Agree of their Parents or Guardians correspondingly into the said Matrimony; and in case they, otherwise often ones, commonly indented Servants, and you can carry out and you may should rescue simple and continue maintaining indemnified the above mentioned-mentioned John Dickinson Esquire…and you will will concurrently save harmless and keep indemnified this new Clergyman, Minister, or Person who shall get in on the told you Functions for the Matrimony, getting, or from the Reason from their thus doing; next this Obligations as Void as well as not one Perception, otherwise to stand entirely Push and Virtue.”

During my lookup, I have seen several wedding bonds having my personal ancestors and you will search sufferers. That, including, ‘s the relationships from my partner’s fourth-great-grandparents, Lewis Tharp and you can Joanna West.

Lewis Tharp and you can Joanna Western was basically partnered inside Fauquier Condition, Virginia inside 1805. The only real record you to definitely stays of the matrimony ‘s the bond, which has new consent out of Joanna’s father. Since she wasn’t yet twenty-that, their own father, John West, considering his written permission. The newest bondsman is William Western, who was simply most likely the sis of Joanna West. eleven

George Tharp and you can Polly Noland, Virginia, 1801

A new thread I discovered whenever comparing south-west family unit members was the marriage bond out of George Tharp and you may Polly Noland. The connection is dated twelve January 1801 inside the Fauquier County. John West is actually the brand new bondsman. several

We calculated there are a few contacts between George Tharp and his awesome bondsman, John West. Basic, John Western try the fresh uncle of Polly Noland. Polly’s mother, “Gemime Noland,” considering their own permission to possess Polly so you can marry George Tharp, just like the she wasn’t yet ages 21. Jemima (Arnold) Noland are brand new sister out of Bathsehba Arnold, who was simply the new wife out-of John West. Jemima try widowed by the time Polly is hitched, that is probably why sibling John Western try asked is the fresh bondsman.

Next connection between John West and you may George Tharp would be the fact John Western paid taxation getting George Tharp when you look at the 1799 and you may 1800. thirteen This could imply that George Tharp is actually used by John Western, perhaps because a keen apprentice otherwise slave. Men exactly who working other people was basically constantly accountable for make payment on fees of them servants or apprentices. 14