This would indeed never be an issue with so it framework; Sir John de- Keith d

This would indeed never be an issue with so it framework; Sir John de- Keith d

Re: ? Comyn wife off Malise

Concerning the Comyn child who was simply spouse regarding Malise away from Strathearn, I’d theorized within the 2005 you to definitely she was in fact Margaret, defined as spouse of Sir John de- Keith (find content of post lower than) who was simply 2ndly age are provided because post: the new wife Emma I suggest is of some other loved ones, and not mother of 2nd Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sandwich _Comyn, Earl of Buchan_ , claims to some extent, ‘Malise, Earl of Strathearn, got a partner Emma, during the 1261-1267, whose surname try unknown ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. away from Docs., i. 2383, 2451]. a bit in advance of 1270, so as that his widow (Margaret) would have been « available » sometime once Emma.

This is of course a conjecture; it does feel the advantage of dealing with a known dating between Muriel Keith and you may Reginald le Cheyne. Any more relevant files do however become greeting.

The fresh new membership in the Scots Peerage towards group of Keith says away from Sir John de Keith (d. california. 1270) which he try considered provides partnered Comyn, earl regarding Buchan vilken dating-app anvГ¤nder kinesiska. It identification, of your unclear (« believed to have been ») diversity, can now be corrected according to the pursuing the dispensation, dated during the Fondi to the fourteen The month of january 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, 50 On bishop of Moray. Faculty so you’re able to dispense Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you will Murielle, damselle, d de- Keth, off Moray and you will Aberdeen dioceses, on obstacle to help you relationship as a result of the third and you will next levels of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step 1. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, zero. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the future next spouse of Robert Stewart, initially Duke out-of Albany (d. 1420), is actually contracted so you can get married Reginald le Cheyne, child out of Sir Reginald le Cheyne because of the his partner (due to the fact their particular earliest spouse), Helen regarding Strathearn. When you’re you can find famous openings from the origins of Muriel Keith, she and Reginald ce Cheyne would display a lineage on Comyns. But not, this really is as well faraway to need a good dispensation in the event that Muriel try a beneficial-great-higher grandd Comyn, Earl regarding Buchan (d. 1233), which could end up being the case if is why child.

2. Reginald le Cheyne is actually an excellent-grandson of Marjory Comyn, child from Alexander Comyn, Earl away from Buchan (d. 1290), son off William Comyn in the list above. Their own young buck is actually Malise, Earl from Strathearn of 1312 to his death when you look at the 1328 , and you may father off Reginald.

ca. 1270), is actually just like Marjory Comyn, and you can hitched 2ndly so you’re able to Malise, Earl off Strathearn (d. 1312). This will imply brand new parentage a€?considered provides been’ that of Margaret, spouse of Sir John de Keith, is actually of one to age group: she would n’t have been the fresh new d Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan, but rather out of his child Alexander. There’s no research you to definitely Earl Malise and you may Marjory Comyn was indeed partnered far prior to 1275: given that Lindsay blogged,

You will find that discernable foundation about what the connection between Reginald le Cheyne and Muriel Keith might have stayed: if Margaret Comyn, wife away from Sir John de- Keith (d

‘ The fresh new spouse of earl, in the 1275, is titled Marjory, while we comprehend the attesting term off No. curriculum vitae., in fact it is stated because of the Wyntoun, Publication VIII. man. vi., to possess started next sister regarding John Comyn, Earl from Buchan, who discussed on the behalf of Earl Malise the marriage payment above stated [dated within London, April twenty six, 1293 for their daughter Matilda and Robert de- Tony, son out of Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = Elizabeth de- Quincy Elizabeth regarding Buchan I __________________I________________ We III 1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de Keith We (als I E from Strathearn . 1270 We Margaret) I d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ We I I We I I Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de- Keith de- Keith Age off = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de- Tony We ______I_______________________ We I We I Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de Elizabeth out-of Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. ca. 1343 We le Cheyne We I I = 2) Sir David I V We I de Graham Sir William de- We We__________ Keith We We = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ I We I III I We I We Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith le Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke off Albany)